The retrograde copyright reform plans Commissioner Oettinger presented today spell disaster for the internet. Oettinger has let copyright reform be hijacked by corporate interests and turned a blind eye to the needs of artists and users. This attempt to remake the web to accommodate analogue business models is doomed to fail at great cost.

The planned special copyright for news sites would curtail freedom of expression on the internet and harm both small publishers and innovative startups. In the end, it will benefit nobody: Internet platforms and users alike will stop linking to EU news with the preview images and teaser snippets that drive traffic, but would now require licenses. Erecting toll booths on the way users arrive at EU news today won’t make up for declining newspaper revenues, but instead doom even their digital properties. The news industry’s troubles can’t be solved with copyright law.

Oettinger’s insistence that end users sharing links will not be affected is an attempt at misdirection. Links posted to social networks today automatically include a snippet from the linked article, which the proposal would undeniably make subject to licensing for 20 years after publication. No exception is provided for individuals. Accordingly, this proposal would make posting a link to an article from 1996 to Facebook illegal without a licence. Oettinger’s denial was even belied by President Juncker’s State of the Union speech, in which he called for revenues for news publishers ‘whether [their content] is published via a copying machine or hyperlinked on the web.’

The Parliament has rejected this idea multiple times in its resolutions on the Digital Single Market. It must do so again. Already, MEPs from all political groups are coming together to voice their opposition.

Additional plans to impose new obligations on sites hosting user-uploaded content also threaten both European startups and community-based platforms such as Wikipedia. In a disappointing reversal of Vice President Ansip’s previous announcements, the discriminatory practice of geoblocking is here to stay – digital borders will continue to turn away Europeans ready to pay from video on demand services based in other member states. The voices of half a million Europeans who demanded freedom of panorama across the EU have also been ignored.

The one bright spot are the proposed new exceptions for educational, scientific and archival institutions – but neither they nor the hastily added plans for free wifi in European cities can outweigh the catastrophic proposals.

To the extent possible under law, the creator has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this work.


  1. 1

    Madam Juliahere is not important that the European Commission’s proposal does not fit into the digital world wienksze importance here is the reference to content filtering is that what you mention is not consistent with the fundamental rights of man Articles 8.11 and 13, and the judgment of the European Court of Justice. As for the tax on the links is unlikely to reach it to the Commission that it is harmful, and for artists and for users of culture, and it must fall within Parliament or national parliaments. There is much more important issue which the Commission ignored the protection of the public domain, no obligatory wyjątu for panorama, parody, pastiżu and memes and for scientific purposes and many other .Uważam that a huge role during the reform should play a Court of Human Rights

  2. 2
    Francine Cunningham